Is the Feed Pure Propaganda?
From: "Charles David Prescott, III"
To:
Subject: American Dissident Voices: Destroying Order
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 12:49:03 -0500
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
>
> American Dissident Voices Broadcast of November 24, 2001
>
> Destroying Order
> By Dr. William Pierce
>
> Hello!
>
> George Bush had his wife on television last Saturday drumming up public
> support for his war. The basic theme of her message was that the Taliban
> -- and fundamentalist Muslims generally -- don't treat their women the
> way Politically Correct Americans believe they should be treated. The
> Muslims make them wear head-to-toe covering in public, won't let them
> drive cars or hang out in shopping malls, and there's hell to pay if one
> of them is caught flirting with a man who isn't her husband. Worst of
> all from Laura Bush's point of view, the women under Taliban control
> aren't permitted to work in factories or offices but instead must stay
> home and take care of the kids. The message was that it's our duty to
> make the folks in Afghanistan treat their women the way Mrs. Bush thinks
> they should be treated. If they won't do things her way voluntarily,
> then it's our duty to use cruise missiles and B-52s to force them to do
> it her way.
>
> Another theme of Mrs. Bush's message was that the aim of terrorists is
> to oppress women. Osama bin Laden's Sepember 11 attack didn't have
> anything to do with Israel or the U.S. government's long-term support of
> Israel's aggression against her Muslim neighbors; his aim was to oppress
> women. He hates us because American women are permitted to wear shorts
> and to hang around shopping malls instead of staying home with the kids.
> He wants to use terrorism to force us to make American women behave like
> Afghan women. The nutcase feminists over here may have believed that,
> but it sounded just as silly to me as Mr. Bush's claim that the
> September 11 attack was unprovoked: that we were attacked just because
> the fundamentalist Muslims hate our freedom and democracy.
>
> Well, I am sure that fundamentalist Muslims do look on American behavior
> with disgust. I am sure that they are shocked by the way many of our
> women dress in public, they are shocked by the effeminate behavior of
> many of our men, they are shocked by the morally and socially
> destructive propaganda we permit Hollywood and New York to pour into our
> homes through television. But I am equally sure that their disapproval
> of our behavior here in America was not the reason for the September 11
> attack. And I am sure that they have no intention of trying to oppress
> American women or to make Americans change their behavior over here.
> Their concern is only with what we do in their part of the world.
>
> One other thing I'm quite sure about is that George Bush didn't put his
> wife on the air last Saturday to talk about the oppression of women in
> Afghanistan because he really cares about that or because he really
> believes that Osama bin Laden wants to force American women to wear
> burqas. His aim was strictly to drum up support for his ongoing war
> against Israel's enemies in the Middle East. Actually, the Jewish
> brainwashing machine in Hollywood was churning out hate propaganda
> against Afghanistan even before the Taliban government refused the Bush
> government's demand that it turn over Osama bin Laden. There was a
> special program about Afghanistan on CNN instead of the standard news
> programming; it was clearly aimed at persuading American liberals and
> feminists that Muslim fundamentalists -- especially those in Afghanistan
> -- are a bad bunch. When I saw the program I said to myself, somebody is
> getting ready to wage war against Afghanistan whether the Taliban
> government turns over Osama bin Laden or not, and this program is
> designed to build up war sentiment among Americans.
>
> I've been seeing a lot of news reports about events in Afghanistan that
> most Americans don't have a chance to see. For example, I have a very
> disturbing set of photographs from Ananova, a news agency in the United
> Kingdom. The photos were taken last week, just after George Bush's
> buddies in the Northern Alliance moved into Kabul. A Taliban soldier who
> had stayed behind tried to surrender. The Northern Alliance soldiers
> beat him up, and then they pulled down his pants and castrated him, and
> while he was writhing in agony on the ground they began using him for
> target practice. I never will forget the look of wide-eyed terror on the
> man's face just before he was castrated. The last photograph in the
> series shows two Northern Alliance soldiers with big grins on their
> faces pumping bullets from their AK-47s into the poor bastard while
> other Northern Alliance people, also grinning, stand around watching the
> spectacle.
>
> I was surprised to see a few photographs of the same incident in this
> week's issue of Time magazine: surprised because Time magazine and its
> boss Gerald Levin are solidly on George Bush's team, and they want us to
> think well of Mr. Bush's Northern Alliance buddies. Of course, Time did
> sanitize its account of this Taliban soldier's fate by neglecting to
> mention the castration -- although elsewhere in this week's issue a
> reporter describes how he was invited to watch while a prisoner's eyes
> were gouged out with a knife. These people doing the castrating and
> eye-gouging are the nice folks Mr. Bush has been paying with our tax
> dollars to fight the Taliban. These are the people Laura Bush would have
> us believe will end the oppression of women in Afghanistan.
>
> I doubt it. In fact, Mr. Bush's Northern Alliance buddies would about as
> soon gang rape women in Taliban territory and then hack off their
> breasts as they would castrate and murder Taliban POWs. They get a big
> kick out of that sort of thing, and that's what they used to do pretty
> regularly before the Taliban took over and forced them into their
> enclave in northern Afghanistan a few years ago.
>
> I'm not saying that the Taliban's supporters are nice people, but they
> certainly are no worse than George Bush's buddies, and they did impose
> law and order on their country: law and order that no longer exist,
> thanks entirely to George Bush. The Taliban had forced a certain code of
> behavior on Afghan women -- and on Afghan men too, I should add -- out
> of religious conviction. The Northern Alliance people don't care as much
> about religion. They don't care whether women wear burqas or not; they
> just like to gang rape and mutilate them. And they've done a lot of
> raping and castrating in the past few days, courtesy of the U.S.
> government. In addition to raping and castrating and gouging out eyes,
> they like to impale prisoners on sharpened stakes and watch them
> wriggle.
>
> Most Americans don't get to see any of this because the small portion of
> it reported by the media here is sanitized and minimized in order to
> keep the people who are doing the dirty work for the New World Order
> gang in Afghanistan from looking too bad. The consequence of this
> one-sided news coverage is that a substantial fraction of Americans
> believe Mrs. Bush when she announces that we are turning Afghanistan
> over to the Northern Alliance in order to end the oppression of women
> there, and they believe Mr. Bush when he assures them that we are
> helping the good guys in Afghanistan beat the bad guys in order to end
> terrorism.
>
> As I said last week, what Mr. Bush really is trying to do is replace the
> Taliban with a more corrupt government that can be bribed and threatened
> more easily than the Taliban could. He wants a puppet government that
> will not be a threat to Israel.
>
> George Bush knows how to end terrorism against America from that part of
> the world. He doesn't have to start a war or bomb anyone or overthrow
> anyone else's government. All he has to do is quit letting Israel use
> America, to quit helping the Israelis kill Palestinian women and
> children with weapons and money supplied by the United States. He knows
> that as well as I do, but he pretends that he doesn't, and that's one of
> the reasons I know he is a crook.
>
> And his wife is a crook too. If she were really concerned about the
> plight of women in that part of the world, she would speak out about
> what the Jews in Israel are doing to Palestinian women and children. She
> would protest the White slave trade that is flourishing in Israel, with
> tens of thousands of White women lured or kidnapped to Israel from
> eastern Europe and forced to work as sex slaves there in appalling
> conditions. She would not stand beside her husband and give a big smile
> and a hug to Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, the Butcher of Beirut,
> the Jewish leader who engineered the murder of thousands of Palestinian
> women and children in Lebanon in 1982, whenever he comes to Washington.
>
> The Bush family is a family of liars and traitors: corrupt people
> flourishing in an increasingly corrupt period for America. It is too bad
> that they cannot be made now to experience the things that they force
> men and women in Afghanistan and Palestine to experience. Perhaps the
> time for that will come later. Meanwhile they are riding high on the hog
> and are convinced that they're pretty smart for selling out our people
> and doing the will of the Jews, in return for Jewish political support.
> They believe that they can bring the whole world under Jewish rule and
> benefit themselves at the expense of all the rest of us. They believe
> that they can bring about the New World Order, as George Bush's father
> used to brag when he was President, by waging war after war against
> countries that refuse to knuckle under -- Iraq, Serbia, Afghanistan --
> using our unlimited supply of cluster bombs and cruise missiles to
> terrify dissident countries into submission and topple stubborn
> governments so that they can be replaced with compliant ones.
>
> George Bush and his colleagues are willing to risk more foreign
> terrorist attacks along the way to their New World Order; in fact, in
> some ways foreign terrorist attacks are useful to them. They are much
> more concerned about domestic resistance to their New World Order scheme
> than they are about foreign terrorism. And when I say "domestic
> resistance," I'm not thinking primarily about domestic terrorism. The
> government-and-media crowd are not terribly concerned about domestic
> terrorism unless it is waged on a scale much larger than it has been in
> the past and is sustained long enough to have a destabilizing effect. In
> fact, occasional acts of domestic terrorism are useful to them, just as
> acts of foreign terrorism are, but in a different way.
>
> Foreign terrorist attacks are useful in that they provide a pretext for
> wars needed to force unwilling countries into submission to the New
> World Order, as in the case of the current war against Afghanistan and
> the planned war against Iraq. Of course, when there is no threat of
> terrorism the New World Order planners generally can use some other
> pretext. That was the case with the Clinton government's war against
> Serbia, for example. The excuse there was that the Serbs were
> mistreating the Albanian minority in Serbia's Kosovo province, and so we
> had to bomb Belgrade in order to force the Serbs to see the error of
> their ways, but an excuse that flimsy often won't hold up under stress.
> If the Serbs had had any kind of decent air defense system and had taken
> out a dozen or so U.S. bombers over Belgrade, or if they had been able
> to sink one of our ships in the Adriatic which was firing cruise
> missiles into Serbia, the American public would have lost its stomach
> for the war in a hurry. Much better for sustaining a war of that sort is
> a foreign terrorist attack, so that the war can be portrayed as
> necessary for America's security or as retaliation for an attack against
> Americans.
>
> Foreign terrorist attacks also provide a pretext for suppressing
> domestic resistance, which as I said is a matter of greater concern to
> the government anyway. A foreign attack gives the media an opportunity
> to whip the lemmings into a flag-waving,
> we-all-must-support-our-President mood, in which there is no tolerance
> for dissent, and it gives the government an opportunity to enact
> repressive legislation that can be used to stifle domestic resistance to
> a certain degree. We are seeing both these consequences of the September
> 11 attack now. The downside of the September 11 attack for the
> government and the media is the rise in anti-foreigner and
> anti-immigration sentiment among the public. It's a downside for the
> government and the media because keeping America's borders open is an
> important element of the New World Order scheme.
>
> I also suspect that the government would prefer that the next foreign
> terrorist attack against the United States not be quite as damaging to
> the U.S. economy as the September 11 attack. A few more like that could
> destabilize the economy and generate a lot of public unrest.
>
> Except when they really need a good excuse to start another war, the
> government and media schemers can make much better use of domestic
> terrorism, especially if it can be blamed on anyone who seriously
> opposes their schemes. The media bosses and other Jewish leaders really
> were reaching after the Oklahoma City bombing in an effort to blame that
> on me, just because I wrote a novel 25 years ago in which there is a
> truck-bomb attack on a U.S. government building. They're really hoping
> now that it will turn out that the anthrax letters are being mailed by a
> heterosexual White male who doesn't like Jews and is connected to an
> organization of similar heterosexual White males, so that the government
> will have an excuse for shutting down the organization and enacting even
> more restrictive legislation.
>
> I'll guarantee you this: if it is a White American who eventually is
> charged with the anthrax letters, you'll hear a lot more about it from
> the media than you will if it turns out to be some Muslim immigrant from
> the Middle East. And of course, if it turns out to be a Jew just trying
> to stir up anti-Muslim sentiment by signing the letters "Allah is
> great," you won't hear about it at all, unless you're a news junkie like
> me.
>
> People like George Bush, John Ashcroft, and all the other politicians
> who are committed to the Jewish New World Order really are determined to
> abolish our Bill of Rights. They want to bring U.S. law into line with
> that in Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and most of the
> rest of Europe, where anyone who speaks out against Jewish control or
> Jewish influence can be imprisoned by the government. And I must tell
> you, this government and media program of curtailing our civil liberties
> worries me much more than the prospect of more hijacked airliners or
> truck bombs.
>
> At the moment the program the government and media people are pushing is
> military court-martials and summary executions for suspected terrorists:
> secret evidence, no right to confront one's accuser, no jury; just a
> military officer who decides whether or not to have you shot as a
> suspect. But don't worry, they tell us, this is only for suspected
> terrorists who aren't U.S. citizens. If you're a citizen, the new rule
> doesn't apply to you.
>
> Well, let me tell you, I worry anyway. I worry when the media Jews and
> the FBI both begin talking about how convenient it would be if they
> could torture suspects to extract information and Attorney General John
> Ashcroft praises a new law which provides for summary executions for
> suspected terrorists who aren't citizens. I worry because I know that
> one thing leads to another. I know these bastards who run our government
> and own our mass media. I know that they regard each new encroachment on
> our freedom as just another step toward their ultimate goal, which is no
> freedom at all for us. Today a law giving them a license to shoot
> suspected terrorists who aren't citizens; tomorrow a law extending the
> shooting license to include citizens. George Bush and John Ashcroft and
> all the rest of the New World Order enthusiasts around them are evil
> men.
>
> They are evil men, and they also are dangerous men because they have the
> support of the mass media. And because they have the support of the mass
> media they also have the support of the great mass of Americans who
> don't have a thought in their heads that didn't come from their
> television screens. The yahoos with the little flags tied to their car
> antennas believe that being patriotic means not criticizing the
> government. It means doing what the government tells you to do. It means
> believing what the government tells you to believe. If the government
> tells you that a law permitting the shooting of suspected terrorists
> will make us all safer, then the flag-wavers are all for it. If another
> law permits the secret police to break into your house while you are
> away and search through your personal belongings and private papers to
> find evidence against you without telling you about it, then that must
> be a good thing too, otherwise the government wouldn't do it, right?
>
> Laws are essential for order, and a government also is essential to
> administer and enforce the laws. The type of government and the system
> of laws suitable for one people might not be suitable at all for another
> people, another nation. I certainly would not want to live in a society
> ruled by the Taliban. But the Taliban at least gave the Afghans law and
> order, and my belief is that it is not a good thing for us to tell other
> nations how they should conduct their internal affairs or what sort of
> laws they should have. It is not our business to decide whether or not
> Afghan women should be required to wear burqas.
>
> I wonder if the flag-waving Americans who are cheering what George Bush
> has done to Afghanistan by destroying law and order there have any idea
> what life would be like in America without law and order.
>
> I often encounter really foolish people who believe that if we're
> tolerant and respect other people's rights they'll respect ours; that if
> we share what we have with others, so that no one is really deprived of
> what he needs, then we can all live together in our wonderfully diverse,
> multicultural society even without a government and laws. These people
> don't understand that without fear of the police to keep our
> multicultural elements in line, America quickly would devolve into
> savagery. Without order, the flower-child types who preach tolerance
> would be hunted down for meat and eaten alive on our city streets.
>
> Even if we had an all-White society, we would need laws respected by our
> people. Without laws there is no order, and without order there is only
> savagery. Every gang boss, every religious nut with a few followers,
> every cult leader would be fighting with others for turf, for followers,
> for resources, for power. For most people life would be hell. Our people
> spent a long time -- thousands of years -- developing a system of laws
> and government to provide order for our societies so that we could live
> useful and productive lives. George Bush and the media bosses who are so
> eager now to abolish the hard-won laws that provide for our rights, our
> liberties, and to make new laws giving more and more control of our
> lives to the government undermine respect for the laws and for the
> government. They may retain the support of the yahoos, but it wasn't
> yahoos who established our rights and built our system of laws in the
> first place. The yahoos always just went along for the ride. The
> government, by becoming more repressive and more intrusive,
> delegitimizes itself and provides a prerequisite for its overthrow.
>
> When that happens we'll all be in peril until something new and
> healthier is formed from the chaos. But I cannot help but wish that
> George Bush is still around during the chaos, so that he can experience
> some of the things the Taliban prisoners in Afghanistan are experiencing
> now at the hands of his Northern Alliance pals.
>
> Thanks for being with me again today.
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
> Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
> It is distributed by e-mail each Saturday to subscribers of ADVlist.
>
> To subscribe to ADVlist send an e-mail message to:
> ADVlist-on@NatVan.com (The subject and body of the message don't
> matter.)
>
> For more information about National Vanguard Books or the
> National Alliance see our web site at http://www.natvan.com or
> http://www.natall.com
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.282 / Virus Database: 150 - Release Date: 09/25/2001
